VIRTUAL
POSTER SESSION
|
|
Introduction
Research Questions
Materials and Methods A database was assembled using information from 874 Mutisieae specimens. These specimens were geo-referenced and climate and elevation layers were taken from WorldClim.com. Maps were generated using ArcGIS (Esri 2005). A branching diagram of the tepui was generated based on distances among the tepui and the size and number of rivers separating the tepui. Table 1 was constructed using the GIS maps and published information to determine the range of each taxon. The distribution pattern of each taxon was compared to the cladogram of the tribe to determine whether it reflected the phylogenetic divisions. Results
Genus Level
Based on the molecular data Chimantaea, Quelchia, Stenopadus, and Stomatochaeta belong to the Stenopadus group, and Achnopogon, Duidaea, Eurydochus, Glossarion, Gongylolepis, and Neblinaea are placed in the Gongylolepis group. The Stenopadus and Gongylolepis groups are no longer considered sister groups. Thus, the basic east-west split between the distributions of these genera reflects a similar split in the phylogeny of the Mutisieae. Several possibilities could account for exceptions to the pattern. Achnopogon, the only eastern-endemic genus in the Gongylolepis group, is considered most closely related to Gongylolepis, which is the only other genus in the group that contains eastern-endemic species. Gongylolepis may have been widespread before erosion separated the tepui or perhaps the eastern-endemics originated from a dispersal event and Achnopogon later branched off from these taxa. The six taxa endemic to individual tepui suggest speciation occurred after the plateau was eroded. The two species of Gongylolepis and one species of Stenopadus that have widespread, lowland distributions may have originated through dispersal from tepui to the lowlands. Taxonomic re-groupings may in part explain the widespread distributions of some genera. Stenopadus talaumifolius - the only widespread, high-elevation group in any of the genera - contains what used to be six distinct species, suggesting that this species needs to be studied on the population level.
Future Research Future studies will involve the large species-rich genera and the possibility that the species limits may need to be revised. This study has helped to pinpoint which taxa need to be studied. Climate patterns and dispersal events may also explain the variations to the basic eastern or western distribution patterns and need further study. Acknowledgements We would like to thank Sara Alexander for her help databasing specimens, Dan Cole for lending his expertise on ArcGIS, Tom Hollowell for extensive technical support with regard to ArcGIS and the Microsoft Access database, and Carol Kelloff for help with georeferencing and all-around support throughout the completion of this project. |
|
Smithsonian
Institution The information presented here, as part of the Research Training Program Virtual Poster Session, represents preliminary data as the result of ten-weeks of investigation in-residence at the National Museum of Natural History. This is not an official publication nor are the finding presented here necessarily conclusive or definitive. As preliminary information, these results and/or findings should not be cited as part of conclusive work. Please contact the author if you would like further information about this research as well as the resulting scientific publication and/or presentation. |