Research Training Program

Smithsonian Institution
National Museum of Natural History

PROJECT SUMMARY
1995


Laura Ellen Rose
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina
Robert Faden, Ph.D.
Supervising Scientist
Department of Botany

"Perhaps one of the most rewarding aspects of the experience at the Smithsonian this summer is the training I have received in modern systematic methodology. My recent research interests have focused generally on plant pathology and epidemiology. In hopes of attending graduate school to investigate this area further, systematics was an area excluded in my studies. I sincerely appreciate this opportunity to explore one more aspect of botany which will prepare me for a career in the research sciences. "

Comparative Leaf Anatomy of the Genus Aneilema

ABSTRACT

The genus Aneilema is divided into seven sections based on morphological and cytological differences as well as geographic distribution. The two sections, section Aneilema and section Amelina, are basal to the other five sections. This project investigated whether anatomical characters of these two sections supported the section limits based on cytology, morphology and geography. Histological methods were used including epidermal leaf peels, paraffin-embedded cross-sections and paradermals, whole leaf clearings, and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) to investigate the leaf anatomy. The members of these sections were then scored for the presence of certain leaf hairs, variation of leaf structure and venation, arrangement of vascular tissue and other diagnostic characters.

From this study, it was concluded that the most primitive section, section Aneilema, does not possess any shared derived characters by which to distinguish it from other sections within the genus. The characters this section exhibited were found in many other species from other sections of the genus Aneilema, as well as in most members of the tribe Commelineae. However, some of the more derived sections did possess shared derived characters which support the section limits of the genus. Section Amelina had at least two characters which distinguished it from section Aneilema. These were uniseriate hairs and two forms of hook hairs. Comparative anatomy has proven to be a practical method to help differentiate some sections of this genus from others. When cytological and morphological methods have been exhausted, leaf anatomy can be a valuable source for additional characters in studying phylogenetic relationships.

This research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation Research Experiences for Undergraduates program, Award Number BIR-9300225.

Letter of Gratitude