Research Training ProgramSmithsonian
Institution
|
||
Laura Ellen Rose Duke University Durham, North Carolina |
![]() |
|
| Robert Faden, Ph.D. Supervising Scientist Department of Botany |
||
| "Perhaps one of the most rewarding
aspects of the experience at the Smithsonian this summer is the training
I have received in modern systematic methodology. My recent research
interests have focused generally on plant pathology and epidemiology.
In hopes of attending graduate school to investigate this area further,
systematics was an area excluded in my studies. I sincerely appreciate
this opportunity to explore one more aspect of botany which will prepare
me for a career in the research sciences. " |
||
|
||
ABSTRACT |
||
From this study, it was concluded that the most primitive section, section Aneilema, does not possess any shared derived characters by which to distinguish it from other sections within the genus. The characters this section exhibited were found in many other species from other sections of the genus Aneilema, as well as in most members of the tribe Commelineae. However, some of the more derived sections did possess shared derived characters which support the section limits of the genus. Section Amelina had at least two characters which distinguished it from section Aneilema. These were uniseriate hairs and two forms of hook hairs. Comparative anatomy has proven to be a practical method to help differentiate some sections of this genus from others. When cytological and morphological methods have been exhausted, leaf anatomy can be a valuable source for additional characters in studying phylogenetic relationships.
This research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation Research Experiences for Undergraduates program, Award Number BIR-9300225.