Click on either icon 
to return to BIRDNET 
home page
BIRDNET: the ornithological information source. Presented by the Ornithological Council
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Back to list of Issue Briefs

Issue Brief from the Ornithological Council

Volume 1
Number 4: 3d edition, March 1999

CATCHING BIRDS INSTEAD OF FISH: The Effects of Longline Fishing on Seabirds

 

THE ISSUE

Longline fishing by commercial vessels is responsible for the deaths of thousands of seabirds annually, including the endangered Short-tailed Albatross. Without regulatory protection and monitoring programs, other bird species may become endangered or threatened. It is estimated that the commercial fishing industry is losing 1% or more of its catch owing to hooked birds and stolen bait, costing the industry about $5 million a year. Fisheries and conservation organizations and government agencies all want to reduce bird bycatch.

POLICY ISSUES

Measures that have been instituted to solve the problem of seabird bycatch:

Measures that have been instituted to solve the problem of seabird bycatch:

Measures that can further help reduce bycatch:

BACKGROUND

During long-line fishing, lines up to 80 miles long with over 30,000 baited hooks are set on lines behind the fishing vessel. Seabirds see the bait near the surface as lines are deployed. The birds dive on the bait, becoming hooked or stealing the bait. Tens of thousands are hooked and die each year. There are over 4,000 ground fish vessels fishing the waters around Alaska. Hawaii had fewer than 10 commercial fishing vessels in its waters prior to 1990 and now has over 140. In the southern oceans an estimated 500-100 million hooks are set annually. Seabirds are only one of several unintended species caught (sea turtles, marine mammals, sharks and non-target fish are also caught). Many countries practice long-line fishing: the most predominant being Japan, China, U.S., Norway, Argentina, Taiwan, Brazil, Spain, Chile and Uruguay.

 Birds are hooked or steal bait mainly when lines are being set and the bait is near the surface. Once a bird is hooked, the line sinks much more slowly owing to the buoyancy of the bird. This increases the risk of other birds becoming hooked. A few simple measures have been shown to help reduce seabird bycatch. Unfrozen bait sinks faster, thus making it available to the birds for a shorter period of time. Weighted lines help the bait sink faster. Trailing a streamer line in the air behind a vessel interferes with the birds' diving on bait. But there are no data on the effectiveness of these or other proposed measures and research is badly needed.

EFFECTS OF LONGLINING ON SEABIRDS

In each of the last 3 years an estimated 2,000 Laysan Albatross and 2,000 Black-footed Albatross were killed in the waters around Hawaii. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service estimate that in the Bering Sea/Gulf of Alaska area 10,000 birds are killed annually. Short- tailed Albatross, an endangered species, are caught in the waters off Alaska and have been seen around Hawaii. In the southern oceans, it is estimated that over 40,000 albatross of several species are killed annually. Populations of Wandering Albatross, a species of special concern, are estimated to be declining by 10% annually owing to longline fishing. Other birds killed include petrels, skuas, gulls, kittiwakes, fulmars, shearwaters, and penguins.

 We do not have good information on how many birds are caught in most areas where longline fishing occurs, thus we cannot truly asses the extent of the problem. Current estimates for seabird mortality are conservative. Even on boats where the hooked birds are counted as lines are hauled in estimates are low because sharks eat the birds and some are torn off the hooks.

CURRENT STATUS

Preliminary experimentation with different fishing techniques and gear modifications has shown that seabird bycatch can be reduced by using some inexpensive techniques, but the effectiveness of these techniques has not been evaluated. Further research and experimentation is needed on methods to avoid bycatch, particularly inexpensive methods that will not be a hardship for fishermen to implement. Then data should be collected on the effectiveness of methods.

There are few observers on longline vessels taking data (4% of vessels in Hawaii and 30% in Alaska), and the data taken are not designed to monitor seabird bycatch. For instance, observer duties do not include watching the setting of lines when most birds are caught. Also, observers have many duties and do not have the time to collect data on seabird bycatch. A new program of monitoring, which makes monitoring bird bycatch a priority, needs to be designed and implemented. More vessels need to have observers, observers need training in how to recognize seabird species, and the data collected need to be more comprehensive. To accomplish this, funding is needed.

References:

Brothers, N. et al. 1995. The influence of bait quality on the sink rate used in the Japanese longline tuna fishing industry: an experimental approach. CCAMLR Science 2: 123-129.

 Gould, P. J. 1995. Black-footed and Laysan Albatrosses: trophic dynamics and fisheries interactions. Abstract, First Intl. albatross conference, CSIRO, Hobart, Australia.

 Johnson, D. H. et al. 1993. Incidental catch of marine birds in the north Pacific high seas driftnet fisheries in 1990. Intl. N. Pacific Fisheries Comm. Bull. 53: 473-483.

 Wohl, K. D. et al. 1995. Incidental mortality of seabirds in selected commercial fisheries in Alaska. Circumpolar seabird working group. Conservation of Arctic flora and fauna, & CAFF Intl. Secretariat. Ottawa, Canada.

 Citation: Ornithological Council 1997. Catching birds instead of fish: the effects of longline fishing on seabirds. Bird Issue Brief Vol.1, No.4. Washington, D.C. 


Top  |  List of Issue Briefs  |  BIRDNET Home Page

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Unless otherwise noted, all original material in this and all linked pages © 1998 by The Ornithological Council, All Rights Reserved.
Page last revised: 4 December 1998